Valuations and volatility

With some markets looking overpriced and the possibility of more volatility, where should equity investors go hunting?

Can investors trust valuations right now?

Valuations. They're pretty high right now in many equity markets around the world. But does that mean these stocks are overvalued, fair value or in four-alarm-fire territory?

Likewise, volatility, as measured by the Vix index showing the movement in the S&P 500 - often a bellwether for other equity market indices - has been spiking upwards ever since August, when "fire and fury" comments from the US President caused geopolitical uncertainty.

The Vix rose from a range between 8 and 9 up to 11.11 on 9 August and hitting 16 on 10 August, and is now settling back around 10.

But while politicians can make market-shaking statements, and while the effects of global disasters can cause short-term market tremors, what does the future really hold for investors?

This report aims to show exactly whether investors can trust valuations, where valuations may be slightly frothy and how advisers can help shore up their clients' portfolios against any future market shocks.

As Marcus Brookes, head of the multi-manager team at Schroders comments, while the US market is extremely expensive right now, other markets such as Europe and some emerging countries do look better value.

To find out how Mr Brookes is positioning portfolios, watch the video interview he gave to FTAdviser about valuations, volatility and the virtue of diversification.

Simoney Kyriakou is content plus editor for FTAdviser

Advisers go on the defensive over high valuations and market volatility

Equity market valuations look overstretched according to some commentators, prompting financial advisers to move client portfolios to a risk-off position.

Philip Milton, chartered wealth manager for PJ Milton, said too much money is flowing to some of the highest income-paying equities in the UK stockmarket.

Keen to avoid what he sees as the risk of being in a highly concentrated stock market, and due to the poor returns on fixed income, he has been moving out of high-risk bonds and equities into infrastructure investments to diversify his clients' portfolios, to lower risk and maximise income.

He said: "These will provide diversification and uncorrelated exposure away from equities to help conserve capital values as much as producing above-interest income returns for clients."

Mr Milton said he had been "concerned of late" by the fact some of the UK's biggest funds have invested heavily into companies such as AstraZeneca, which recently had a "big negative hit" after it published poor results.

"Did you know that 30 of the 87 funds in the Investment Association's Income sector had Astra as a top 10 holding?

"Twenty-eight had British American Tobacco in that position. The same overpriced stocks have been chased higher, too, both by ‘cheap’ passive, index-tracking funds and exchange-traded funds, and because of the weight of money being subscribed to this sector, often by unsuspecting investors."

His comments echoed the sentiment of advisers polled by FTAdviser Talking Point, 34 per cent of whom believe equity markets are due a correction soon.

A further 28 per cent of advisers considered equity markets to be "a bit stretched" at the moment.

Only 17 per cent of respondents thought there was a distinct difference between developed markets and emerging markets, with 21 per cent claiming markets were still "good value".

Advisers believe what goes up is soon to come down...

Advisers believe what goes up is soon to come down...

Likewise, fund managers and analysts have warned investors to be canny over valuations.

Stephanie Butcher, fund manager for Invesco Perpetual, commented: "As we have described frequently before, focus on valuation is the over-riding philosophy that informs allocations.

"To our minds over-paying for any asset, whatever its quality, is taking on additional risk."

Tanguy De Lauzon, head of capital markets & asset allocation at Morningstar Investment Management Europe, said: "The question of whether we can trust valuation metrics is a recurring theme across history that stems from the “this time it’s different” mentality.

"We know starting yields are low, growth is modest and valuations are stretched. Hence, even if valuations remain at the outer bounds of normality, the return backdrop is likely to be lower due to the compressed starting yield.

"The alternative would be for valuations to revert, where we would see negative returns followed by something closer to normality. The point here is to acknowledge is that valuations matter regardless of the stage in the cycle."

CPD: How to measure portfolios in the light of high valuations

CPD: Words by Daniel Liberto

Doomsayers are finding their voice again...

Click on any financial news website and you are likely to come across at least one article predicting that global stock markets are about to collapse.

Numerous experts, including bond guru Bill Gross and seasoned investor Jim Rogers, have pitched in with glum predictions over the past few months.

Many of them say that the days of global indices surging into record territory on a weekly basis are no longer sustainable as aggressive stock buying activity has led equities to be priced for perfection.

Frothy valuations: A ticking time bomb?

Lofty valuations don’t automatically result in share prices declining, although they do often lead investors to reevaluate their positions and contemplate cashing in on gains.

Once price targets are met, rational investors will generally seek to establish whether there is enough earnings potential on display to power another rally and justify the high showing of confidence in the stock.

Usually it is that cautious mentality that leads markets to suffer a fairly big correction every eight months or so. It’s generally been that way since the war, although this time around investors appear to be defying that popular logic.

Most equity markets have been in full on bull mode since Donald Trump won the US presidential election over 10 months ago and, despite the odd blip, show little sign of giving in – if readings from the various volatility indices are
to be believed.

An unforeseen rise in volatility could lead to quantitative strategies like trend followers or risk parity funds amplifying the rise

Bill McQuaker, Fidelity

Fear gauges are hovering at strikingly low levels, indicating that investors are confident there are enough growth prospects in sight to continue powering the global economy and company profits.


“Investors are currently pricing in not just a stable pricing environment for the S&P 500 for the next few months, but basically the most benign risk environment in the history of the index,” say James Luke and Mark Lacey, commodity fund managers at Schroders. “To us, this is odd from many angles.”

Sceptics have taken this strong show of faith as a sign that investors foolishly believe that the market is risk-free – and argue that global economic trends are about to prove them wrong. If history is anything to go by, they may have a valid point.

In the high-flying US stock market, the PE 10 ratio, a valuation measure that uses real per-share earnings over a 10-year period, currently stands at about 30, the third highest on record. The last two times the ratio surpassed this point was in 1929 and 2000, right before disaster struck.

Black Tuesday and the dot-com bubble, two of the most devastating stock market crashes of all time, occurred when investors realised that the hype buoying the stocks they heavily bought into was misplaced.

All it sometimes takes is a minor setback to trigger a correction. When speculation leads valuations to as high as they are today, sell-offs can be particularly aggressive.

"An unforeseen rise in volatility could lead to quantitative strategies like trend followers or risk parity funds amplifying the rise, panicking retail investors who have pumped cash in over the course of the past year,” says Bill McQuaker, manager of Fidelity’s multi asset open range of funds.

Central Banks reach turning point

Mr McQuaker reckons that a rise in interest rates could serve as one of those triggers of panic. “Higher inflation, possibly driven by an acceleration in wage growth, would bid goodbye to the ‘Super Goldilocks’ environment of strong growth and low inflation,” he says.

“Central banks would almost certainly be compelled to raise interest rates, which would force a re-assessment of the outlook, and the low discount rates upon which high equity valuations have been justified.”

The Federal Reserve (Fed) recently announced that it plans to continue increasing the cost of borrowing in the US.

Several other countries have similarly warned that interest rates could be set to rise, owing to a steep increase in inflation.

Central banks also hinted that they are keen to phase out quantitative easing, another tool that has been credited for boosting stock markets in recent years.

Should monetary authorities finally put an end to years of pumping money into the financial system and lowering borrowing costs, appetite for equities will likely take a hit.

Alastair George, an investment strategist at Edison, is shocked that these developments, coupled with an uncertain global economic outlook, have yet to cause panic across equity markets and believes that greed has caused investors to lose sight of the basic fundamentals.

“We believe there remains a significant degree of uncertainty in the economic outlook at present,” he says.

Even boring old-fashioned equity income funds are still quite highly valued, so they are not immune to a correction in the market

Robin Keyte, Keyte Chartered Financial Planners

“However, because of the long period of asset price gains in this decade, investors are currently reluctant to demand increased risk premiums for risky assets for fear of missing out.”

US bubble set to burst?

Mr George is particularly concerned about the direction of the US economy, despite the Fed’s best efforts to ensure investors that it is on the mend.

“The staff turnover at the Fed makes policy even harder than usual to forecast,” he says. “Trump’s policy agenda appears stuck in politics and would now require an astonishing turnaround to become a meaningful positive for investors.”

Mr McQuaker agrees that Trump’s government will struggle to implement its agenda and warns that the president’s popular policies, such as tax reform, have been misinterpreted as good for all companies.

To add to these risks, he argues that many of the tech companies - such as Netflix or Google - responsible for powering the US stock market rally will struggle to live up to the lofty expectations held by investors.

“Super companies could easily disappoint investors, through failing to execute business plans properly, incurring the wrath of anti-trust regulators, or over-promising on the benefits of new technology,” he says.

China, Brexit and North Korea

Worryingly, the world’s second biggest economy and largest global consumer is also not immune to risk. As Neil Woodford has been quick to point out, rising debt levels in China could easily derail the country’s banking system and entire economy.

Other major concerns at this stage include North Korea’s nuclear weapons threat, frequent terrorist attacks in the West and the mysterious outcome of Brexit.

"There’s more political uncertainty now then I think we’ve ever seen,” says Robin Keyte, director of Keyte Chartered Financial Planners.

Mr Keyte has been surprised by the stock market’s response to warnings of global economic turmoil. He claims that investors are regularly ignoring potentially devastating developments, preferring instead to cling onto positives.

One example he gave was the boost the depreciation of the pound has given to UK equities.

"There’s no doubt that the UK markets have been given a large boost by the devaluation of the pound, but that is a one-off hit. That is not something that is going to continue,” he says.

How should advisers be positioning clients now?

In an environment where hype overpowers alarm bells of uncertainty, Mr Keyte prefers to invest in “as boring a way as possible”.

He claims that investing in non-equities is not an option right now, mainly because commercial property and fixed interest, his first port of calls, are gripped by fund suspensions and paltry returns, respectively.

As a result, he’d rather stick his clients’ money in equity income funds.

“Even boring old-fashioned equity income funds are still quite highly valued, so they are not immune to a correction in the market,” he says.

“But when there is a drop, at least there is an income yield of three to four per cent to soften that blow. It’s as dull as that.”

Value can always be found

For other investors, including Minesh Patel, chartered financial planner at Finchley–based EA Financial Solutions, funds that target undervalued equities currently represent one of the most sensible options.

Headlines regularly point out that global indices are rising, yet fail to mention that only a handful of companies are often responsible for these surges.

“Investing in equities is investing in companies that have listed on stock markets throughout the world,” says Mr Patel.

A willingness to preserve capital takes precedence and we have advocated increased cash levels to provide protection and ammunition

Tanguy De Lauzon, Morningstar

“While equity markets as a whole are highly valued on measures such as price earnings ratio, there is still value to be found across different sectors and, therefore, investing in active funds where stocks which still offer value are identified are likely to produce positive returns going forward.”

That type of approach is currently favoured by Fidelity’s Bill McQuaker, who claims that companies in the energy sector, as well as some solid US stocks, have been overlooked in favour of racier growth prospects.

Value strategies also tend to fare better in volatile markets, although it is a style of investing that might not suit all clients, particularly those approaching retirement.

Cash and gold

“Portfolios should always reflect the clients’ objectives as a priority, with the market landscape and positioning a derivative of that objective,” says Tanguy De Lauzon, head of capital markets and asset allocation at Morningstar Investment Management, Europe.

“It is therefore never as simple as saying ‘the US market is expensive so we avoid that asset. Russia is cheap so we invest heavily in it’.

Instead, advisers should be concerned with ensuring that the clients’ objectives are best reflected via a holistically considered portfolio that contemplates valuations on a risk-adjusted basis.

“With this in mind, valuations are generally stretched and the valuation-implied return expectations are commensurately lower than what could be considered under ‘normal’ conditions", Mr DeLauzon says.

"This implies that prudence is warranted across the entire portfolio range. As the allocation between cash, fixed income and equities are ultimately the biggest driver of performance, a willingness to preserve capital takes precedence and we have advocated increased cash levels to provide protection and ammunition."

Another potential insurance policy against stock market turmoil is gold. "Gold could turn out to be an under-owned and well-priced insurance policy,” say Mr Luke and Mr Lacey at Schroders.

“Gold’s perceived ‘safe haven’ status is well-supported with hard evidence. For example, if we look back at gold price performance between 1961 and July 2017, it is very clear that gold price annual returns were positive, particularly during periods of high inflation, while stock market returns were negative", they add.

Daniel Liberto is a freelance financial journalist

The house view from Schroders:

A narrow tightrope?

There is a sense that investors are now walking a narrow tightrope.

Many investors have become convinced of a “Goldilocks” scenario where central bankers, in their wisdom, engender macro-economic conditions that are neither too hot nor too cold.

Those crowded into the winners of this bull market are (inadvertently or not) banking on this status quo persisting.

So, what might change this? What’s on either side of this metaphorical tightrope? Our base case for now is that economic data continues to improve at the margin.

The softening experienced in recent months appears to be moderating - slowly but surely allowing confidence to return.

Labour markets are increasingly tight (in other words, unemployment is low) in a number of economies – the US, UK, Germany and Japan, to name a few.

This is driving the more hawkish behaviour of central banks in recent weeks. At some stage these conditions should also spur wage inflation.

Broadly speaking this means a continuation of gradually rising interest rates in the US and growing calls for less accommodation elsewhere.

It doesn’t take a huge shift for some of the standout performers of recent years to look quite vulnerable. In this scenario, bond proxies, technology et al may well underperform.

If the recent election in the UK has taught us anything, it’s that austerity is now a dirty word to many parts of the electorate

Marcus Brookes, Schroders

The quarter-end rotation in equity markets back to the ‘value’ style has been welcome, albeit short-lived to date.

However, we do believe conditions are in place for this to persist for the time being.

Risks to the current consensus lie within changing politics as well. If the recent election in the UK has taught us anything, it’s that austerity is now a dirty word to many parts of the electorate.

Greater fiscal spending is something likely to be mirrored around the world. All of which adds to a less deflationary backdrop for investors.

On the flip side, though, the risks are becoming clearer. This is already the third longest economic expansion in history. It is difficult to argue that we are closer to the beginning than the end.

Gains for investors have been huge and prospective returns from here look constrained at best.

The S&P 500 in sterling terms is up circa +355 per cent since the troughs of March 2009. Clichés abound, but nothing lasts forever.

We think it’s wise to at least begin shifting emphasis towards capital preservation.

Remember, the average bear market gives back circa 50 per cent of the gains made in the proceeding bull phase.

To be clear, this is not us ringing the bell for an imminent bear market. It is however, us acknowledging that the risks have increased and we should be considering this in portfolio construction.

Nor do we necessarily think a recession is imminent. However, the balance of probabilities tells us that one is likely in the next few years.

Something that could be brought on by rising interest rates in a highly levered world.

Anecdotally, we have started hearing of some investors suggesting that the slow grind up in this market cycle means it will likely be a long drawn out downturn with plenty of warning signals.

When you hear this alarm bells should be ringing. Loudly. We are not making such assumptions. The opposite may in fact be more likely given how bullish investor positioning appears to be.

Wrapping all of this together, there is a sense that many investors are dependent on quite a narrow macro-bet for current market conditions to persist, whether they are aware of this or not.

Valuations suggest to us that the opportunity lies away from this consensus.

In portfolio terms, we are spending significant time ensuring we balance the relative attractiveness of selective equities, alongside the need for appropriate portfolio protection given the different scenarios that might unfold.

Marcus Brookes is head of the multi-manager team at Schroders

Tightrope picture: Photo by Leio McLaren on Unsplash